I'm doing a 'leadership' program offered by my college this semester, mostly because it's something I would have REALLY benefited from about five years ago, but it wasn't a thing then. I'm not getting a ton out of it so far, but I'm also not regretting it. The assoc dean who leads it keeps meetings to an hour a month, plus the occasional optional workshop.
Yesterday, ironically enough, was a meeting about meeting culture. I also received results of one of those personality assessment (the StrengthsFinder one). What floated to my top 5 (the ones they ranked for us) clarified much for me.
My strengths are: Intellection, Input, Discipline, Strategic, Relator [yes, it bugs the shit out of me that these are different parts of speech]
Here's a description of my first: "People exceptionally talented in the intellection theme are characterized by their intellectual activity. They are introspective and appreciate intellectual discussions." More words about roles: thinker, philosopher, muser, longer, writer, blogger. You think?
Perhaps not surprising for a group of academics, of the 26 of us who were tested, this one came up in the top 5 for 12 of us. It was FIRST only for me and a dept chair in a closely related dept. Interesting, huh?
What occurred to me, as I was sitting in the meta meeting thinking about meetings and what pisses me off and also what feels so good about the occasional thing that goes right is that while I have spent much time thinking about my lack of knowledge in my DISCIPLINE, I haven't spent much time thinking about these 'soft skills.' And I really should. On sabbatical.
More later.
Yesterday, ironically enough, was a meeting about meeting culture. I also received results of one of those personality assessment (the StrengthsFinder one). What floated to my top 5 (the ones they ranked for us) clarified much for me.
My strengths are: Intellection, Input, Discipline, Strategic, Relator [yes, it bugs the shit out of me that these are different parts of speech]
Here's a description of my first: "People exceptionally talented in the intellection theme are characterized by their intellectual activity. They are introspective and appreciate intellectual discussions." More words about roles: thinker, philosopher, muser, longer, writer, blogger. You think?
Perhaps not surprising for a group of academics, of the 26 of us who were tested, this one came up in the top 5 for 12 of us. It was FIRST only for me and a dept chair in a closely related dept. Interesting, huh?
What occurred to me, as I was sitting in the meta meeting thinking about meetings and what pisses me off and also what feels so good about the occasional thing that goes right is that while I have spent much time thinking about my lack of knowledge in my DISCIPLINE, I haven't spent much time thinking about these 'soft skills.' And I really should. On sabbatical.
More later.