Yesterday.... I had about 3.5 hours of actual childcare. Plus another hour in which Tiny Boy zoomed with his grandmother.
In the Before this would have been laughable. But it's more help than I've had in the three months of stay-at-home. It was amazing.
It turns out--and I knew this, but still--in a two hour stint I can do more than double the work I can do in one, because one just isn't long enough to get into it in any depth (what others would call "flow"). I had time to shift locations (in and out). I had time to work on two different projects. I had time to take a walk without feeling like I was just abandoning my kid in front of the TV.
I'm hoping this plan will take us through the summer. Two hours is camp LG; they made a schedule (it includes biking and sports, science projects, baking, art/music). Ideally in the afternoons for two hours he will be with a teen who lives two doors down. Outside. Socially distanced.
I have to say while I'm a bit freaked out by the connections the teen has (three siblings, who are all seeing friends in a semi-distanced way) at this point I'm less worried about the virus than I am both Tiny Boy's and my mental health. This isn't just about 'productivity.' I just can't do it anymore and be anything resembling a "good" mother.
I know I've said this before, but this is an instance of the fundamental disconnect between what partnered parents call "parenting solo" for a short time and actually being a single parent. I haven't had a break from childcare duties in three months, other than the hour/day provided by LG or what is afforded by the TV and Tiny Boy's semi-regular zoom calls (during which he will still call me to talk to him).
I might just be talking myself into this arrangement here, because I really am a bit freaked out. But for the moment--unless cases spike in my area (our state is down to 100-200/day right now, and hardly any in my area)--the risk of COVID is so much smaller than the REALITY that both Tiny Boy and I need outside intervention.
Thoughts?
In the Before this would have been laughable. But it's more help than I've had in the three months of stay-at-home. It was amazing.
It turns out--and I knew this, but still--in a two hour stint I can do more than double the work I can do in one, because one just isn't long enough to get into it in any depth (what others would call "flow"). I had time to shift locations (in and out). I had time to work on two different projects. I had time to take a walk without feeling like I was just abandoning my kid in front of the TV.
I'm hoping this plan will take us through the summer. Two hours is camp LG; they made a schedule (it includes biking and sports, science projects, baking, art/music). Ideally in the afternoons for two hours he will be with a teen who lives two doors down. Outside. Socially distanced.
I have to say while I'm a bit freaked out by the connections the teen has (three siblings, who are all seeing friends in a semi-distanced way) at this point I'm less worried about the virus than I am both Tiny Boy's and my mental health. This isn't just about 'productivity.' I just can't do it anymore and be anything resembling a "good" mother.
I know I've said this before, but this is an instance of the fundamental disconnect between what partnered parents call "parenting solo" for a short time and actually being a single parent. I haven't had a break from childcare duties in three months, other than the hour/day provided by LG or what is afforded by the TV and Tiny Boy's semi-regular zoom calls (during which he will still call me to talk to him).
I might just be talking myself into this arrangement here, because I really am a bit freaked out. But for the moment--unless cases spike in my area (our state is down to 100-200/day right now, and hardly any in my area)--the risk of COVID is so much smaller than the REALITY that both Tiny Boy and I need outside intervention.
Thoughts?