Wednesday, January 25, 2012

Mama, PhD

The title of this post comes from a book that came out a few years ago that I read both with interest and with a fair amount of annoyance.  It's a discussion of/by mothers who are also PhDs, and what struck me at the time was how many of them chose not to pursue academic careers, or, more generally, who saw academe and motherhood as incompatible.  When I think about my own grad school cohort, I know of very few who have the trifecta of kid, book, and t-t employment.  I can think of women who chose to follow spouses straight out of school, and I can think of women who put off childbearing until it was too late.  (Of course, I don't know how many in my entering class actually wanted kids, but I can think of multiple women for whom fertility became a major issue.)  There's a lot of stuff here that involves personal choice as well as the academic job market, partnership, and so forth that I don't want to get into at length (at least not in this post).

But as I'm coming off maternity leave (ack!) and as I just read a great post at Dr. Crazy's (http://reassignedtime.wordpress.com/2012/01/24/on-forgetting-to-have-babies/), I've been thinking a lot about what it means to be a productive, balanced academic mother.  I'm not talking about those women who chose to go back to work two weeks after giving birth and put their kids in full time daycare immediately and basically chose not to raise them (many disclaimers:  I do realize that depending on one's work situation, this might be the only option, as if one is a grad student, has no maternity leave, etc).  Nor am I talking about those women who decided to ignore their PhDs and become SAHMs (though, again, that can be either by chance or by choice).

In many ways, I'm an odd duck, so to speak, as I chose single motherhood not as a desperate my-clock-is-ticking measure but actively, at 27 (well, I made the decision at 27, acted on it at 29, and had LG at 31).  Then I left a "family friendly" job at a SLAC for my current R1 position (better living situation, closer to family) and spent the first three years overwhelmed with the demands of the job.  I'd planned on having kids 4-5 years apart and spent LG's fourth year wondering if I'd actually go through with it, as my third year review left me demolished (it was a good outcome, but the process was completely demoralizing and stressful).  Then the review was over and I found some semblance of balance and decided to fuck it all up by undergoing fertility treatment (and thus the story of Something Remarkable begins).  Gosh, this is a long set up.  Anyhoo...

Here I am, with Tiny Boy going on an hour asleep, typing frantically, wondering what things will be like when I'm really back at work.  Like, in the classroom full-time.  A single mother to two kids?  When will I get my work done?  Will I sleep?  And what do I actually want my career to look like, now that Tiny Boy and tenure lined up so neatly (not, I'll remind you, what I wanted--if my uterus hadn't rejected the baby I conceived in a relatively timely fashion, I'd have a two-year-old--but professionally it does have its advantages)?  While these are personal questions about my priorities and qualities of life issues, I do think there's a bigger conversation that needs to happen (not just in the blogosphere) about what it means to be an academic mother and to do both successfully and be sane throughout the process.  I don't want to be like my senior colleagues who stalled out at the associate level because they had their post-tenure kid and then became saddled with both motherhood and service/administration and didn't write anymore.  But after spending something in the vicinity of 60K to have Tiny Boy, I'm not really inclined to stick him in daycare any sooner than I absolutely need to.  I'd like to mother him, even if I have no desire (not to mention the finances) to become a SAHM.  And that might mean it will be another few years before I teach a grad class, as ours are exclusively taught in the evening, and I'd like to have dinner with and put my kids to bed.  And there are many other choices, small and large, that I will need to think through, now that I have the luxury (and believe me, I am grateful beyond words to have the job I do in this economic climate) to do so.

Squawking boy.  It's milk time, folks.

9 comments:

  1. "those women who chose to go back to work two weeks after giving birth and put their kids in full time daycare immediately and basically chose not to raise them"

    Hmmm....I dunno. I guess I'm one of those women (though it was more like 6 weeks after giving birth -- and, of course, for the younger two, I wasn't actually the one who gave birth).

    I certainly had other choices (including the option of SAHM or part time work), but this was the one that worked for me. I'm not an academic, but I really like my rather demanding job and feel like I'm using my advanced degree *and* mothering my kids.

    In sum, I think there are a lot of different ways to raise kids.

    My model is my own mother, who, back when it wasn't at all the norm, worked way more than full time (she was a medical student, then a resident, then a doctor) from the time my brother and I were babies.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ive got not idea, also having my kids off to school now that I have tenure, how to proceed. My only role models either had kids early on, or forewent motherhood, so I don't even know who to follow. So you know, should oyu figure it out, please do blog about it.

    oh and at this point I'd be happy to consign my kids to after care for a bit, but we must sort boychild's issues out before that can happen. We did have the luxury and desire to have a parent at home with each child until aged 2, but that was us. Peeps gotta do what feels right for them.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Niobe, of course you're right. And I apologize. I suppose I stated that too forcefully; there are many different ways to raise kids, and many different living/child-rearing situations I haven't accounted for here. And certainly going back to work soon after birth is a viable choice for some women/families/babies, and I'm not really questioning other people's choices. That--possibly false--binary I set up was really to make the point that I've got no role models. I was "raised" by some major feminist scholars, who had no kids or were of the generation that never mentioned kids, if they had them, in the workplace, because that would mean they weren't "serious" scholars. I think our generation is starting to think differently about these issues, which is one of the reasons I'm enjoying blogs by academics who are also mothers. But I don't know anyone personally who has it all figured out or who has the kind of balance I think I'd like. I don't want my career to stop...and I hit a pretty productive streak by the time LG was about 9 mo...but I also want to be available for my son, continue breastfeeding, etc. And occasionally blog and see friends...

    ReplyDelete
  4. Also...I can't really speak to other careers, even high powered ones, because I think they work differently than academic cultures...but again, perhaps another subject for another blog post...

    ReplyDelete
  5. Interesting -- I kind of want my younger sister to read this, and the book you reference. She just got tenure and definitely on the older side for starting a family, but I wish she would just take the leap already and stop waiting for the perfect time in her and her partner's academic careers. But, as my wise mother says, it's HER life....

    ReplyDelete
  6. irrational...what field is your sis in? some of these issues are also field specific/job market dependent

    ReplyDelete
  7. Gwinne: Thanks. I really appreciate your saying that and I probably shouldn't have taken your comments so personally.

    Anyway, though it's not at all the same thing and this probably didn't come across, I am very sympathetic to the concerns you raise in this post.

    Particularly since my husband's an academic at an R1(though admittedly not in a STEM field).

    ReplyDelete
  8. Does the Chronicle of Higher Ed still have the Mama PhD blog that gave birth to that book? I found it useful, back when I thought of myself as an academic ...

    And ... as you say here later in the comments ... we have to be careful about what we mean by mothering and parenting. Because we all define those activities differently.

    Finally: wouldn't it be nice for people at the R1s to talk about parenting? To realize that without people willing to raise a family, they will lose their reason for being?

    ReplyDelete
  9. The blog's at Inside Higher Ed...though I don't read it as regularly as I should... thanks for reminding me!

    ReplyDelete